It's 1984 in Massachusetts-And Big Brother is Gay

[Christine]

I am moving this article and the comments by several readers from my old discussion forum to this current board. Although the original article and comments are from 2001, it is evident that gay rights activists have drastically furthered their agenda (with help from the Massachusetts Supreme Court) to be the first state to legalize 'gay' marriage. This article, as well as the formation of a GSA (Gay-Straight Alliance) in the public school in my town prompted me to get involved in Christian activism to counter the indoctrination going on in public schools.

Christine

It's 1984 in Massachusetts – And Big Brother Is Gay
Posted Dec. 17, 2001
By John Haskins
Mary Clossey's children see no American flags at school to remind them that it is their safety that young men are risking their lives to defend. Rather, her daughter and other pupils are filed into an auditorium to hear a speaker liken the U.S. military to terrorists.

For years the Newton, Mass., public schools have blithely violated a Massachusetts law that the flag be on display in every classroom. On the other hand, there are many flags on display if you count rainbow flags that symbolize a "gay-friendly" environment.

When Clossey enrolled her son in Newton North High School's reading program little did she know that the teacher had bragged in the Boston Globe (July 8, 2001) of quietly introducing homosexual and transsexual subjects into his classes. The teacher, Michael Kozuch, handed out The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky with instructions to write an essay on it. What literary "treats" did Kozuch consider mandatory for other people's children? Sex between a boy and a dog, man-boy sex, anal sex between boys, male masturbation and female masturbation with a hot dog. By chance Clossey opened the book her son brought home. But what came after that shock was worse: She encountered public officials who saw protective parents as obstacles.

Clossey called her mayor. He never called back. Calling school officials, she says she encountered "arrogant disrespect for parents." So she filed a criminal complaint against the teacher for corrupting a minor. Even Boston's hard-line pro-homosexuality newspapers and TV stations couldn't sit on this. But the complaint went nowhere. It emerged that Kozuch was not acting alone. The book was on a reading list given to every student. Urged by other furious parents, Clossey went to the local prosecutor. But the receptionist had been warned to expect her, according to Clossey. She waited and waited, but was not allowed to speak to her district attorney.

After parents discovered the book, Newton North High School educators removed it from class discussion but refused to remove it from the reading list. Alert parents already knew the high-school language department, on one pretext or another, had showed Ma Vie en Rose, an R-rated film about a "homosexual" child. Pupils learned how "Ludo enjoys being a girl. Borrowing mommy's red high heels, her lipstick, her earrings … yummy!" Trouble is, 7-year-old Ludo is a boy, even if he is pretty in pink.

Freshmen learn about masturbation and sodomy in a required course that uses street language, as if proper vocabulary would ruin the educational experience. A large mural in a corridor depicts two girls holding hands, reading something called "Romea and Juliet."

Is Newton a rogue town? In nearby Brookline a transsexual told first-graders how his penis was cut off and he became a woman. With no sense of irony, the Globe called it "sex-change counseling." Parents, never notified, had to comfort their terrified children.

Ashland children were instructed to play homosexuals in a skit. As reported in the Middlesex News on April 1, 1994, one boy's line was: "It's natural to be attracted to the same sex." Girls were told to hold hands and pretend they were lesbians.

As reported widely in Massachusetts in 1992, at a required assembly in Chelmsford, an instructor used four-letter words describing the joys of anal and oral sex. The children then licked condoms.

Framingham pupils found themselves answering this Orwellian questionnaire: "1. What do you think caused your heterosexuality? 2. When did you first decide you were heterosexual? 3. Is it possible heterosexuality is a phase you will grow out of? 4. Is it possible you are heterosexual because you fear the same sex? 5. If you have never slept with anyone of the same sex, how do you know you wouldn't prefer it? Is it possible you merely need a good gay experience? 6. To whom have you disclosed your heterosexuality? How did they react? 7. Why are heterosexuals so blatant, always making a spectacle of their heterosexuality? Why can't they just be who they are and not flaunt their sexuality by kissing in public, wearing wedding rings, etc.?"

In Lexington, a parent discovered that her 13-year-old could borrow a book telling how gay men at the opera can socialize with "the backs of their trousers discreetly parted so they could experience a little extra pleasure while viewing the spectacle on stage." Her school purchased it with health funds.

A prominent psychiatrist says the sex-ed curricula at these schools can lower children "to the level of animals" and inflict lasting harm. "Massachusetts schools' systematic promotion of homosexuality and promiscuity fosters sexual confusion and experimentation," says Nathaniel S. Lehrman, former clinical director of the Kingsboro Psychiatric Center in New York. "They dilute and trivialize faithful sexual passion which should be the cement of these children's marriages. Unstable youngsters may become particularly vulnerable to homosexuals who actively recruit them."

There are teachers all over North America quietly mainstreaming homosexual behavior to children as young as 5 years old. As widely reported, on "Gay Days" classes are cancelled and students led to compulsory activities where homosexuals explain their "lifestyles." The mind-control techniques are straight from Soviet schools.

Officials often confront parents who express anger, telling each parent, "You're the only one who complained." The implied message: "It would be unconstitutional to teach Judeo-Christian morality. So we're obliged to teach its polar opposite."

Samuel Blumenfeld, a much-published author on education, says many school superintendents implicitly assert "that children (are) owned by the state." Compelling evidence from Massachusetts:


Silver Lake's freshman health text says: "Testing your ability to function sexually and give pleasure to another person may be less threatening in the early teens with people of your own sex." And, "You may come to the conclusion that growing up means rejecting the values of your parents." Pupils were ordered to keep the book at school and never take it home.


Needham High School violated the parents'-rights law by concealing from parents a schoolwide assembly in which a girl described her first lesbian kiss and rhapsodized about lesbianism. Teachers continued the discussion in homeroom. They also broke the law by failing to tell pupils of their right not to attend. Later, the gay club's faculty adviser announced, in poor English, that parents' decisions to remove their children next year would not be honored, as the "assembly (taught no) moral or religious beliefs."


After a "Homophobia Week" of mandatory assemblies in Beverly, a 14-year-old told her father he was a "homophobe." She had learned that homosexuals have a right to marry and adopt children. Parents were not notified. A boy wrote to a local paper: "I felt disturbed and nauseated. I witnessed biased testimonies by gays and the public mocking of a priest in our auditorium."


A Beverly parent removed a child after discovering the content of a four-day "sexual-harassment" program that replaced algebra. The teacher encouraged the pupil to come back, saying, "Your parents don't have to know."


In Manomet, a health instructor passed out material that an eighth-grader said violated his parents' beliefs. "If you have any trouble with your parents, tell me and I'll handle them," the instructor replied.


A Newton principal refused to remove children from the condom-distribution program, telling their parents, "It's too important."


Local media cover such stories reluctantly, with headlines such as "Local Mother Angered by Sex Ed." They treat not the provocation, but the reaction, as newsworthy. Imagine this back-page headline informing the public of Watergate: "Partisan Democrats Criticize White House."

In the July 8, 2001 Globe article headlined "More schools tackling gay issues," Kozuch discussed his efforts to use schools to shape children's views of homosexuality under the radar screen of parents. "It's low key," he said. "The point is that we want to treat (bisexual, homosexual and transsexual) issues in a way that's matter of course."

Giving gay pornography to other people's children didn't used to be called "treating issues," say critics. And who told schools to "tackle" anal sex?

"Where the radical homosexual movement is gaining control of curricula the citizenry must stop schools' systematic sabotage of children's moral development," says Lehrman, former chairman of the Task Force on Religion and Mental Health of the New York Federation of Jewish Philanthropies.

Some militant homosexuals increasingly feel "called' into teaching the way other people are called to be missionaries. "Tolerance" programs claiming to support gay children (gay children?) provide cover for introducing obscene material and guiding troubled pupils toward homosexuality.

The self-righteous comments of some educators suggest they see innocence as a thing to crush. A child not knowing about sodomy, they feel, is a thing to be corrected. Every child has a right and a need to know what homosexuals do to each other's bodies — and be told it is equivalent to Mommy and Daddy's marriage. "Leave no child behind."

Blumenfeld wrote of the 19th-century establishment of Massachusetts' universal state education that fierce resistance by parents and voters was overcome only by a solemn oath by the state to confine itself to academic matters. The right of parents to guide the moral training of their children was guaranteed. But that was back when children belonged to their parents.

Clossey got a letter from the district attorney informing her that Massachusetts schools, libraries and museums are immune from laws against exposing children to pornography.

It's time to make it a federal felony to crush the innocence of children, with punishments trebled for "educators."

John Haskins is executive director of the Parents' Rights Coalition (www.parentsrightscoalition.org). E-mail him at john@parentsrightscoalition.org.

A reply to the above article:

It's 1984 in Massachusetts – And Big Brother Is Gay
Author : Andrew Ryan Date : 12/23/01
I confess I haven’t read Stephen Chbosky’s “The Perks of Being a Wallflower”. However, reading the mostly positive reviews in Amazon’s “Customer Reviews” section I can’t find any reference to “Sex between a boy and a dog, man-boy sex, anal sex between boys, male masturbation and female masturbation with a hot dog”.
One might equally complain to a Bible-School teacher that the Old and New Testament contains such “Treats” as “Nudity, incest, fratricide, Sodomy, Mass-murder and crucifixion.”

The comments on "Ma Vie Un Rose" are equally misleading. Read Roger Ebert's review, or Leonard Maltin. They stress it is not a film about homosexuality.

Not a particularly even-handed article then! It sounds like people are exaggerating and presenting evidence in the worst possible light.

As to the other comments posted here: Bob from Michigan, if gayness is "Biological Error" (are you saying its God's mistake?) how can it also be "Learned Behaviour"?


My reply to Andrew:


It's 1984 in Massachusetts – And Big Brother Is Gay
Author : Christine Watson Date : 1/7/02
Andrew,
If you had read the article more carefully you would have noticed that the author was mentioning other disgusting literary "treats" that the gay teacher was imposing on other people's children.

Inferring that the Bible teaches such "treats" as those you had mentioned in your comments is just plain ignorance on your part. The Bible doesn't approve of everything that it records. It records truth, including the lies and errors of sinful man. It also includes and records the truth of God's judgment on mankind as well as the only way to escape ultimate judgment through the unmerited grace and salvation offered to human beings through His Son, Jesus Christ. The value of the Bible is not in just what it records, but the invaluable message it reveals.

If you think this is exaggerated or an isolated incident go to the Massachusetts News Archive and read about the "Fistgate" scandal at http://www.massnews.com/past_issues/...ls/fistarc.htm Gay activists are out to recruit and indoctrinate our children under the guise of "safe schools". And vile groups like GLSEN are attempting to destroy parents rights to bring up their own children without exposure to their filth. What's worse is that they are using our tax dollars to do it!

The unhealthy sexual acts of homosexuals is the cause of much disease, deformity and premature death. A lifetime of anal sex is not safe or healthy. Ask any doctor. Yet gay activists want to teach such things to children as young as 5 years old? That's evil...dirty and simple. There is much evidence that homosexuality is a learned behavior. Did you know that 80% of homosexual men have been sexually abused or sodomized as children? The liberal pro-homosexual media won't share that statistic with the general public...they wouldn't want to appear homophobic.

The Medical Institute of Sexual Health reports "homosexual men are at significantly increased risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices," while "women who have sex with women are at significantly higher risk of bacterial, breast cancer and ovarian cancer than are heterosexual women."

The Center for Disease Control reports men involved in homosexuality are 860 percent more likely to contract sexually transmitted diseases, partially because they "have large numbers of anonymous partners, which can result in rapid, extensive transmission of STDs ... threaten(ing) national HIV infection prevention efforts."

"Gay men of all ages remain at an alarming risk," the CDC warns, while "young bisexual men are a 'bridge' to women," threatening not only their own lives but the general population.

"People with same-sex sexual behavior are at greater risk for psychiatric disorders," the Journal of the American Medical Association reported in January, citing Dutch findings that males involved in homosexuality are 727 percent more likely to suffer a bipolar disorder, with greater risk of obsessive-compulsive disorder (718 percent higher), panic disorder (421 percent), mood disorders (311 percent), and major depression (234 percent).

Anticipating homosexual activists' typical victimhood claim - that health risks associated with homosexuality are somehow "caused" by organizations that publicly oppose their political agenda - the study noted that "the Dutch social climate toward homosexuality has long been and remains considerably more tolerant" than other counties.

Oxford University's International Journal of Epidemiology reports "life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is eight to 20 years less than for all men. If the same pattern of mortality continues, we estimate that nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently aged 20 will not reach their 65th birthday."

Homosexual behavior is up to three times deadlier than smoking. Society nonetheless condemns, restricts and spends millions of tax dollars to discourage the lesser threat (tobacco), while irrationally contemplating laws to protect and force social acceptance of the greater (homosexuality).

Our laws should discourage, not enable such deadly behavior.

The risk of bacterial, breast and ovarian cancer is higher in lesbian women than heterosexual women. Facts are facts! And...bisexual men pose an even greater risk to women, serving as a "bridge" of disease to them. My main concern, and the reason I found this article is because I am doing research on the harmful effects that GLSEN (Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network) is promoting to children in our nation's public schools through their GSA (Gay Straight Alliances). Just go to the Massachusetts News Archive at http://www.massnews.com/past_issues/...ls/fistarc.htm and you will be shocked about what has happened as a result of these two vile organizations. One does not need to be a scientist to deduce that homosexuality and/or promiscuity does not produce happiness. Ask the 56 million Americans who are infected with a sexually transmitted disease if that disease brings them pleasure or fun. At the infamous "Fistgate" conference at Tufts University in March 2000 the children were told they could make an “informed decision” not to use a condom. In this day and age of AIDS and STD’s the attitude of these “educators” is not only unscientific but borders on the criminal. AIDS reduces the average life expectancy by almost 50 percent. Twenty-year old active homosexuals are finding it difficult to live past the age of forty. The truth is, amorality, such as homosexual activity, does not provide a happy, fulfilling life. Its hallmarks are disease, discouragement, deformity and death. To claim otherwise is unscientific. Speaking of science, according to Dr. George Rice, a neurologist at the University of Western Ontario, results of the sequencing of the human genome do not support the theory of a “gay gene.” Ideas about the origins of sexual preferences are reverting to the argument that homosexuality is a decision rather than an inherited trait. Also, one's "homosexuality" is often thrust upon an individual by childhood molestation and/or poor familial relations. In fact, in an audio tape of a former gay man (who lived in the gay lifestyle for 9 years) recovered from his homosexual addiction, and has been married for the past ten years. He has two children and is very concerned about GLSEN's militant agenda in public schools. He stated on the tape that his ten year research has discovered that 80% of gay men were either molested or raped as children!! Homosexuality is not a light matter and certainly is not a lifestyle that should be pushed on our children. The dangers of being gay come from the individual’s behaviors associated with gayness rather than the supposed harassment from “homophobes.” The perverted sexual activities are dangerous to the human body and ought never be practiced, let alone suggested in high school. According to the Family Therapy Networker, the high-risk decision-making habits of teens is a result of “shifts toward brain regions that are governed by emotional reactivity.” As a result, teens are drawn toward destructive behaviors such as drinking, taking drugs and experimenting with risky sex. Homosexuals hijacked the word “gay” and changed its original meaning. Ask any giggling middle school student when they sing the refrain, “now we don our gay apparel.” As a pro-moralist, I declare that the word “homophobe” should officially have it’s meaning permanently changed to the following: 1. People who believe that steering kids away from homosexuality is compassionate; promoting it under the guise of “fighting hate” is tragic and cruel. 2. People who object to the schools forcibly exposing their children to harmful sex instruction that conflicts with their values. 3. People (especially parents) who recognize that their rights are being eroded, trivialized and targeted for destruction by homosexual militants. 4. People who believe that schools can teach civility toward all without teaching that homosexual behavior must be accepted as normal and healthy. 5. People who recognized and are alarmed by the fact that the “hate crimes” curriculum is a tool by homosexual activists to advance their agenda of recruiting children. GLSEN’s “sexual orientation” theory presented to children is a blatant attempt to persuade those who are sexually confused to try the homosexual lifestyle. 6. People who recognize that leftist education elitists have no right to indoctrinate children with their immoral political or social beliefs. We need to ensure that school is about academics – not about immoral beliefs. Gay activists know that by undermining the values taught by parents, the hearts and minds of children can be changed. Therefore subversion, not tolerance, is their goal. 7. People who know that, “ there are powerful and convincing scientific and social grounds supporting our position that homosexuality is a harmful lifestyle that gays and lesbians can leave if they choose,” as stated by Jeffrey Satinover M.D. in his book “Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth.” 8. Parents who discovered that some homosexual groups are leading the effort to lower or abolish “age of consent” laws which currently prohibit adults from having sex with children (pedophilia). This is what has developed over the years as a result of the now exposed fraudulent scientific basis of the 1953 Kinsey report. Did you know that in order for Kinsey to obtain his “data” nine pedophiles molested and raped children aged anywhere from infancy to age 10 for Kinsey, who, interpreted the tears, groans and violent cries from the children to be “sexual climaxes”? Yet, despite all of this disturbing information, taking a stand against the gay agenda in public schools can lead to public vilification. “If you protest,” says Brian Camenker of the Parents Rights Coalition of Massachusetts, “be prepared to be stone-walled and sneered by public officials, smeared in the press, and denounced as a hate-monger and a bigot by gay activists.” Yet what choice is left to parents but to fight? “We’re facing an incredible evil here. It chills you to the bone.” Says Camenker, an Orthodox Jew brought closer to his faith by this struggle. “The only way we’re not going to get run over is if people wake up to what’s happening to our children.” “These people are bullies,” he continues, “People are afraid of them, afraid of being called homophobes. I don’t enjoy this, but this is America, and I’m not going to run away.” I’m not going to run away either, Brian.

[Christine]

The following comments include an article that was written in 1997. It shows the mindset (back then, as well as now) behind the militant gay rights radical agenda currently permeating our schools (even to preschoolers!), the media, and the culture and exposes what their true goals really are. We can further see why adding sexual orientation to hate crimes laws is actually a veiled attempt to prevent Christian free speech in opposition to their indoctrination ploys. The arrest of 5 Christian evangelists at the Outfest event in Philadelphia demonstrates the unjust application such 'hate crimes' laws would impose upon free speech of Christian and/or any other religious groups that object to, and oppose, the blatant exposure of pro-gay agenda being "normalized" throughout our culture. Thankfully, true justice prevailed in this case and today is the day that all charges were dropped against 4 of the Christians. The 5th person is a teenager who is expected to have all charges dropped against her within the next few days.

Can anyone admit that "WE TOLD YOU SO" is in order?

Christine

************************************************** *******

It's 1984 in Massachusetts – And Big Brother Is Gay
Author : BobfromMichigan74 Date : 12/19/01
Dear John, I have 560 subscribers to my Yahoo Groups email list. Your article just about sent me over the top. In answer to Terrence, I would remind him that homsexuals are perverts, misfits, biological errors (Thank you Dr. Laura) and sex addicts. Ann Heche is an example (Ellen De-generates ex-lover who has now renouced lesbianism and married a man) that proves homosexuality is a learned behavior very similar to drug addiction. Below is an earlier article, same topic, author unknown to me. BobfromMichigan74@hotmail.com +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
PROVINCETOWN INTRODUCES SODOMY TO PRESCHOOLERS Homosexual "Change Agents" Facilitate Implosion of American Culture Last week the school board in Provincetown, Mass. voted to begin educating preschoolers about homosexual lifestyles, according to an article in the Washington Times. The board also decided in favor of hiring preferences for "sexual minorities," a move that puts Provincetown on the cutting edge of the homosexual agenda. "We are on a trailblazing path," said Susan Fleming, superintendent of Provincetown schools. "We are going to be a change agent." Provincetown is a homosexual enclave on Cape Cod. Nearly half of the town's parents are homosexual, as are the school's top officials. Jeannine Cristina is a lesbian that has a bi-racial daughter in a Provincetown school - a daughter she conceived through artificial insemination. Miss Cristina is also the president of the Provincetown PTA and the one who initially pushed the pro-homosexual school board decision. The adopted seven-point plan broadly calls on the school system to reject "bias" in curriculum. The stated goal is to equip "students, teachers and the community at large with the tools needed to combat racism, sexism, ableism, classism, heterosexism and homophobia and all forms of oppression...." To teach this "anti-bias" curriculum the school system will "search for, hire and retain a diverse staff, including sexual minorities." (Source:The Washington Times, "Provincetown Preschoolers to Learn ABC's of Being Gay," August 21, 1997). Miss Cristina remarked that the success of her proposal is "truly a milestone in education." "I'd be so excited to have this happen across the nation," she said. "But the reality is a lot of work has to be done across the country, and hopefully Provincetown will be the model." Miss Cristina also won the help of local homosexual activist John Perry Ryan who explained that the plan is to end the "dominance" of the perspective of the "white Europeans...who are also very heterosexual, very Christian, very male." (ibid.) President Clinton was vacationing at Martha's Vineyard, about 40 miles from Provincetown, when the school board approved the "anti-bias" plan. Proponents urged the White House to endorse it, but there has been no reaction as of yet. The lack of response is characteristic of the president when confronted with an explosive issue. One may be assured that the silence does not mean indecision, because the president has several militant homosexuals in his administration and his Hate Crimes conference, scheduled for November 11th, plans to address America's "bias" problems. Provincetown and President Have Same Plan In case Miss Cristina is feeling put off by the Clinton's silence about her plan for America, all she needs to do is review his radio address of June 7, 1997. In that address the president announced his planned White House conference on hate crimes, and announced his initiative for the eradication of those "biases" that are the target of the Provincetown plan. On the surface the president's address was full of the usual benign cliches and platitudes, however, the trained ear may discern the trumpet call for another assault in America's culture war. Like George Bush's speeches during the Gulf War, President Clinton's June 7th address was liberally sprinkled with globalist Newspeak. He said, "...as we move into a new century with its global economy and its global society, our rich diversity is a powerful strength...", a powerful strength for the ruling elite, that is, as the American social fabric is ripped to shreds by "diverse" counter cultures, making the enslavement of all more certain. Hate Crime - Daring to Think or Speak the Truth Clinton lamented, "We still have our ugly words and awful violence, our burned churches and bombed buildings." He neglected to explain that this violence is often the effect of the culture war he is nurturing and supporting with his high office. He hinted at a remedy for the "ugly words" that he deems to be the cause of our troubles when he said, "...it is time for us to mount an all-out assault on hate crimes, to punish them swiftly and severely, and to do more to prevent them from happening in the first place." (emphasis supplied). This collectivist solution will not only include a punishment of illegal acts committed, but the restriction of "hate speech" as defined by the cultural elites, and the cleansing of our personal "biases" or "thought crimes" by the cultural "thought police." Clinton went on to say, "...the fight against hatred and intolerance must be waged not just through our laws, but in our hearts as well.... It is just not enough to prevent acts of violence to our bodies, we must prevent acts of violence to our spirits.... Even a small number of Americans who harbor and act upon hatred and intolerance can do enormous damage to our efforts to bind together our increasingly diverse society." (emphasis supplied). In other words, "We must change the beliefs of those who are intolerant of our perversity. As society becomes more corrupt and degraded (diverse), many are likely to become upset by small groups of people reproving our perversions and exposing our lies. These individuals can do enormous damage to our efforts to consolidate complete control over the masses." NEA and Public Education - Potent Weapon of Cultural Subversion Clinton also warned in his address that "a newborn child today does not know how to hate or stereotype another human being; that behavior must be learned," and this is the basis for the Provincetown plan to teach preschoolers about homosexual lifestyles. The earlier a state-run school can get a "head start" against the values and cultural mores of the past, the better chance they have at producing international children of the future. The ruling elites in today's brave New World Order recognize that their battle for global control will be won or lost in the classroom. Public school teachers who teach cultural "diversity" are the lap dogs of the ruling elite. The NEA (National Education Association) passes resolutions every year that are road maps of the planned society of the future. At the NEA's 1996 convention, over one-third of the delegates sported "NEA - GLC" (Gay Lesbian Caucus) buttons, and the NEA-GLC newsletter announced eleven caucuses related to its agenda. (Source: Eagle Forum, "Gay Lesbian Caucus Flaunts its Influence"). Homosexuality permeates the NEA, which dominates public education, which in many ways determines the future of the United States. The NEA and the AFT (American Federation of Teachers) have a combined annual revenue of $1 billion and form the single most powerful block within the Democratic party. They were solidly behind Bill Clinton during his election in '92 and, since then, they have worked together to accelerate the destruction of America's biblically derived values and distinctive culture. Public Schools Introduce Perversity at Tender Age - Institutional Child Molesters It is not possible here to definitively list the controversial resolutions passed by the NEA. It will suffice to list a sampling of them. For example, the NEA is against homeschool programs and "if homeschool study occurs...instruction should be by persons who are licensed by the appropriate state agency...(with a) curriculum approved by the state" so the student receives approved "diversity" training, no doubt. (Resolution C-34, 1988). "Funds must be provided for programs to alleviate race, gender and sexual orientation discrimination and to eliminate portrayal of race, gender and sexual orientation stereotypes in the public schools." In other words, the taxpayers should fund programs that promote homosexuality as a moral superior to normal sexuality and suppress traditional father-mother roles in the curriculum. (Resolution A-13, 1996). "The (NEA) supports early childhood education programs in the public schools for children from birth through age eight...include(ing) mandatory kindergarten with compulsory attendance." Remember, the earlier the better. (Resolution B-1, 1996). The cultural elite of the New Order recognizes the futility of changing people who are set in their ways. At the same time, they are patient enough to mold society over time by capturing the tender minds and souls of children through education. A puppet of Socialist experimentation by the name of Adolf Hitler spoke of this in November, 1933 when he said, "When an opponent declares, 'I will not come over to your side,' I calmly say, 'Your child belongs to us already...What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.'" This belief was echoed by an article in The Official Journal of the American Humanist Association (1983) where the writer declared, "I am convinced that the battle for humankind's future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly view their role as the proselytizers of a new faith.... The classroom must and will become an arena of conflict between the old and the new; the rotting corpse of Christianity, together with all its adjacent evils and misery, and the new faith of Humanism...." So the change agents in education work diligently from coast to coast, introducing sexual perversion and promiscuity to ever younger minds, training them up for a life of mindless enslavement. Occasionally there is a convulsive reaction to this agenda, as there was in New York City in 1994 when school superintendent Joseph Fernandez was fired by the school board. Among the causes for his dismissal was his multicultural Rainbow Curriculum which placed such material as "Heather Has Two Mommies, Daddy's Roommate and Gloria Goes to Gay Pride" on the first grade reading list. After his dismissal he gave a speech entitled, "Trials and Tribulations of being a Change Agent" in Orlando, Florida, evidently referring to his suffering for the cause of truth. (Source: Florida Pro-Family Forum). The list of abominations in public education goes on and on, from proposed school-based clinics offering condoms and sexual advice to grade schoolers, to intense counseling and discussion groups where the child's values are challenged without parental knowledge, not to mention the desecration of everything associated with the straight white male. In this day pubic schools are nothing less than institutional child molesters. Society Destroyed Through Process - It's Too Late The ruling elite of the New Order are promoting homosexuality and promiscuity for a manifold purpose. Their global agenda for population control is one motive, and another is their nearly completed plan to destroy the culture and social fabric of the nations where "men were men" and the women were cherished and protected - where strong families and stable communities were the bedrock the nation was built on. A promiscuous, perverse and dysfunctional population is much easier to control, manipulate and enslave. Many professed Christians and political conservatives insipidly deny that it is too late for the United States and the world, but the truth is this nation has lost its culture, and it is too late to redeem it. What began with "tolerance" of immorality, the "innocent fun in the rumble seat" grandpa used to talk about led to greater and greater evils until this nation found itself being sodomized at the point of a gun in the contemporary culture war. It is too late to turn back. Now the deluge. The militant homosexual agenda is one of the sledgehammers used in America's cutural demolition. This agenda is not just about equal rights - it is revolutionary in its scope and aims to recreate society in its own image. In her book, "The Hidden Homosexual Agenda," Beverly LaHaye wrote, "The homosexual ideology implies the intent to rearrange our perceptions, lifestyles, and legal system. In the strict sense of the term, this change is revolutionary. It requires, if it is to be effectively implemented, the careful and gradual application and transfer of power. The homosexual movement is thus not primarily a philanthropic or educational enterprise, but a hard-nosed political movement bent on changing our society." Nowhere is this truth more shockingly portrayed than in this essay on the homosexual agenda, written by "gay revolutionary" Mark Swift and printed in the Feb. 15, '87 issue of Gay Community News. These excerpts are reprinted from the Congressional Record: "We shall sodomize your sons....We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms...in your youth groups.... Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding.... They will come to crave and adore us. All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men. Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable.... We shall raise vast, private armies...to defeat you. The family unit...will be abolished. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory.... All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men. Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks." What does the future hold for the United States and the rest of the nations swept into the net of the global culture? We may find the answer to this question by sifting the ashes of Sodom and Gomorrah. Written 8/28/97

[Christine]

It's 1984 in Massachusetts – And Big Brother Is Gay
Author : sorhoho Date : 12/20/01
I must tell you that I believe teachers have gone entirely too far! I am a lesbian, and given the circumstances described would not hesitate to pull my children out of these schools. I would go even further though, and contact the powers that be and work to change the laws that allow such abuse of power. Including and not limited to running for office myself.
In my viewpoint, what the teachers are propagating is no more nor less than child sexual abuse, and should be prosecuted as such. Having lived through the horror of sexual abuse as a child, and knowing how it has affected my decisions as an adult, these teachers are my worst nightmare. Imagine being abused at home in secret, then having that behaviour re-inforced, again in secret, at school! School was the one place where I knew I would be safe. I shudder to think what would have happened to my psyche if I had not had that refuge!
Please! Someone stop this insanity before it goes further!

************************************************** ********


It's 1984 in Massachusetts – And Big Brother Is Gay
Author : minuteman2 Date : 12/18/01
DEAR JOHN,AFTER READING YOUR ARTICLE I WILL NEVER LET MY CHILD ATTEND A PUBLIC SCHOOL.I BELIEVE IN LIBERTY AND IT'S AMAZING THAT THE CROWD THAT WANTS TOLERANCE AND UNDERSTANDING ARE'NT WHEN YOU WANT TO REMOVE YOUR CHILD FROM THEIR SCHOOLS.LIBERALS WILL NEVER QUITE COMPREHEND WHY HOME SCHOOLING WILL CONTINUE TO EXPAND AND GROW.THANKS FOR THE INSIGHT.AS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD TO LISTEN TO THIS IN COLLEGE IT'S ABOUT TIME SOMEONE EXPOSED THIS.SINCERELY.RANDELL PITTMAN.

[Christine]

The pro-gay indoctrination that has occurred in Massachusetts schools is now being promoted throughout the country. Thank God we, as a nation, have the ADF (Alliance Defense Fund) attorneys to counter this blatant attempt to eliminate parents' rights to defend their family's biblical beliefs. It is quite evident that people involved in the gay rights agenda are trying to (1) put a gag on students who disagree with homosexual behavior, and, (2) actively attempt to change their moral beliefs.

Christine

************************************************** *******


ADF Sues Kentucky Schools Over Mandatory Pro-homosexual Diversity Training

By Jim Brown
February 18, 2005

(AgapePress) - Parents in a Kentucky school district have filed a lawsuit challenging a mandatory one-hour training video for school children that promotes homosexuality as a safe and healthy lifestyle and homosexual orientation as a fixed and unchangeable trait.

Over the course of a two-year dispute, the American Civil Liberties Union pressured Boyd County school officials into a settlement that requires all middle and high school students in the district to undergo pro-homosexual "diversity training." Several families that do not want their children subjected to the mandatory training have sued the Boyd County Board of Education.

The plaintiffs' attorney, senior legal counsel Kevin Theriot of the Alliance Defense Fund, says the school district will not allow parents to opt their children out of the training without a penalty. He contends that the Boyd County school officials have trampled the parents' rights to direct the education of their children.

However, that is only one of the reasons why Theriot feels the schools are on the wrong side of the law. "The second thing," he notes, "is that the school's policies actually prohibit students from even expressing their view that homosexuality is wrong. And, of course, that has serious implications for the free speech rights of the students."

According to the ADF complaint, students are required to undergo the diversity training without expressing any disagreement. As the plaintiff's lawyer points out, the mandatory diversity training hardly teaches diversity when it "puts a gag on students who disagree with homosexual behavior while it actively attempts to change their moral beliefs."

According to Theriot, the mandatory training obviously crosses a constitutional line by denying the students the right to express their personal beliefs. However, he suspects the schools may not have crossed that line willingly, so much as it may have been pushed across it.

"This is one of those situations where I think the school board was pressured into doing something that they knew wasn't the right thing to do, but they didn't feel like they had any option for one reason or another," ADF's senior counsel says. "The problem is, a settlement agreement can't violate the constitutional rights of a third party, like parents and students, and that's exactly what happened in this case."

Theriot feels the Boyd County Board of Education is misguided, and he says the schools' "diversity training" program is phony because it offers zero tolerance for biblical opposition to homosexuality. And whatever the provisions of the settlement with the ACLU were, they cannot stand if they are not consistent with the United States Constitution.

ADF filed its lawsuit against the school district February 15. The Boyd County Board of Education has 20 days to file a response to the complaint.

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/2/182005d.asp


Jim Brown, a regular contributor to AgapePress, is a reporter for American Family Radio News, which can be heard online.
© 2005 AgapePress all rights reserved

[Christine]

In my discussions with pro-homosexual activists and those who support their agenda, I constantly hear the mantra that they are not out to recruit anyone. I sincerely think that the articles and letters within this thread prove otherwise. The following article demonstrates how the promotion of total acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle (note: not just tolerance) can lead to a mindset where a person can, as is evident in Dennis Prager's article below, be taught not to be a heterosexual.

There is an article on this board which discusses whether homosexual behavior is fluid or fixed. Here, Dennis Prager is asking such a question of a formerly heterosexual woman (admits being completely heterosexual until she got to college) who has since experimented with homosexual behavior. One must ask, which is it for her? Fluid or fixed?

No matter the answer, this example proves that indoctrination is possible, is promoted and is going on within our colleges. There is no doubt in my mind that GLSEN and other homosexual activists groups are involved in recruiting and indoctrination within our K-12 public school system as well. I am so glad that ADF (Alliance Defense Fund) has started fighting back right on the campuses with the Day of Truth counter to the gay agenda's Day of Silence. This is a fight that, unfortunately, is never going away until our Lord returns so we must speak out and counter those who are out to steal the hearts, minds, souls and spirits of our nations' children through such indoctrination of sinful behavior.

Christine

************************************************** ********


This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=43874


Tuesday, April 19, 2005



College taught her not to be a heterosexual

Posted: April 19, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern



By Dennis Prager



© 2005 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Perhaps the most important argument against same-sex marriage is that once society honors same-sex sex as it does man-woman sex, there will inevitably be a major increase in same-sex sex. People do sexually (as in other areas) what society allows and especially what it honors.

One excellent example illustrating this is an article recently written in the McGill University newspaper by McGill student Anna Montrose. In it, she wrote:


It's hard to go through four years of a Humanities B.A. reading Foucault and Butler and watching 'The L Word' and keep your rigid heterosexuality intact. I don't know when it happened exactly, but it seems I no longer have the easy certainty of pinning my sexual desire to one gender and never the other.


(Michel Foucault is a major French "postmodern" philosopher; Judith Butler is a prominent "gender theorist" at U.C. Berkeley; and "The L-Word" is a popular TV drama about glamorous lesbians.)


I interviewed Anna Montrose, a bright and articulate 22-year-old woman, on my syndicated radio show. She is a fine example of the type of thinking and behavior a homosexuality-celebrating culture – such as that at our universities – produces.

The following are selected excerpts, edited for reasons of space, from that interview. The full transcript, the audio and her original article are all available on my website.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DP: Prior to attending university you had your 'rigid heterosexuality' intact. Is that correct?

AM: I think that that's pretty fair to say.

DP: So you and I both believe that how people behave sexually, including which sex they will engage with sexually, is largely determined by society and not by nature.

AM: Yeah, I completely agree.

DP: Gay rights activists say the opposite. They say that whether you act homosexually or not is fixed; and I don't believe it's fixed necessarily at all and neither do you.

AM: But I think that [the activists'] argument has a political purpose, which is to counter the argument that heterosexuality is fixed.

DP: I agree with you. But we both think that they're not telling the truth for the sake of making a political argument.

Since we both agree that largely whom we have sex with and sexual behavior generally are culturally determined, the only question is: Would we like culture to determine [these things] one way or the other? I think 'yes' and you think 'not'. I have a heterosexual preference because my values tell me that male-female love is the ideal. You don't think it's the ideal. Is that fair?

AM: I think that it's one of many options.

DP: It's not necessarily a good thing to teach heterosexual behavior as the ideal?

AM: Yeah.

DP: You didn't know you were sexually attracted to women until you went to university? You had lived 18 years and thought you were only sexually attracted to males.

AM: That's true, but I also had never had a boyfriend either. I didn't date ...

DP: Whether one has a boyfriend or girlfriend is very different from what one wants to have and where one's sexual fantasies lie.

AM: Yeah, that's completely true.

DP: All I'm saying about sexual choices is that society has a deep impact on sexual choices including whether it's same sex or opposite sex. So my whole position is: Thousands of years of Western Civilization preferring male-female bonding leading to marriage and family is a good thing, and Anna feels that it's a bad thing. Is that totally fair? Or am I putting words in your mouth?

AM: I don't think it's necessarily preferable. I think that people should be able to make their own choices.

DP: So one is as good as the other.

AM: Yeah.

DP: So you're saying that for thousands of years, Western society has been wrong for preferring male-female marital bonding.

AM: I only think it's wrong in that it limits other possibilities, which are equally good.

DP: So it is wrong to tell people, wrong to tell little girls, to suggest in any way, subtly or non-subtly, that they should grow up and marry a boy?

AM: Yeah, I don't think that you should force anyone into ...

DP: You said 'forced,' I just said 'suggest.'

AM: How would you just gently tell someone?

DP: By saying, for example, "Well, are you going to marry Jerry or Tony?" instead of, "Are you going to marry Jerry or Barbara?"

AM: I think that the coercion is on a sort of deeper level.

DP: So you feel it's [coercion] to suggest to a girl only male options for marriage?

AM: Right.

DP: Have you acted upon your new revelation of not being a rigid heterosexual?

AM: What do you mean 'acted on'?

DP: Well, had sexual contact with females.

AM: I guess I have, yeah.

DP: Have you had with a male?

AM: I had. I had a boyfriend for a year.

DP: Is there any difference or are they both equally meaningful to you?

AM: Well, there is definitely a difference, but they are also both meaningful.

DP: At this point, do you hope to marry one day?

AM: I haven't really decided on that.

DP: You don't even have that hope? You haven't decided on the hope? I asked if you hoped, not if you decided.

AM: Do I hope to marry? I don't know if I'm going to marry or not.

DP: I didn't ask if you knew; I was asking if you're hoping.

AM: I'm not sure what the difference is.

DP: I hope to win the lottery, but I don't expect to. There is a very big difference. So I'm asking if you hoped to.

AM: Well, hope would imply that that would be ideal. But I'm not going to say that getting married would be ideal. But I'm also not against marriage – I mean you get insurance benefits by getting married, so I can definitely see a case where I would get married.

DP: For insurance benefits?

AM: Yeah.

DP: That's why you would marry?

AM: And tax benefits as well. It's very convenient.





Dennis Prager, one of America's most respected and popular nationally syndicated radio talk-show hosts, is the author of several books and a frequent guest on TV shows such as "Larry King Live," "The O'Reilly Factor" and "Hannity & Colmes."

[Christine]

Bringing thread back from the archives.

[admin]

Some progress is being made thanks to groups like the Liberty Council. But we have a long way to go! We must remain diligent!

Christine

*******

March 22, 2006

School Decides to Cancel Diversity Day Rather than

Include Viewpoint of Christians and Former Homosexuals

Viroqua, WI - Viroqua High School officials chose to cancel tomorrow's Diversity Day activities after Liberty Counsel presented legal precedent requiring inclusion of the viewpoints of Christians and former homosexuals.

The school scheduled sessions for the students that presented the viewpoints of Hmong, Jews, Muslims, Native Americans, African-Americans, homosexuals, Latinos, Buddhists, the physically disadvantaged, and the economically disadvantaged, but not Christians or former homosexuals. Diversity Day would have been held tomorrow, March 23, 2006.

After a school official stated that the viewpoints of Christians and former homosexuals would be excluded, a resident contacted Liberty Counsel on behalf of many other concerned Viroqua residents.

On March 9, Liberty Counsel sent a letter to the District Administrator, explaining that the censorship of the viewpoints of Christians and former homosexuals violated the Establishment Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection guarantee. Liberty Counsel sent another letter on March 14 to the District Administrator and Board of Education. Two days later, the District Administrator confirmed in a telephone call that Diversity Day had been cancelled.

In 2004, the Board also cancelled Diversity Day in response to a citizen petition, but then reinstated it after spring elections changed the members on the Board. Unlike 2004, however, this time school officials were confronted with precedent from a federal district court in Michigan that ruled unconstitutional a similar exclusion from a Diversity Day panel.

Mathew D. Staver, president and general counsel of Liberty Counsel, stated: "We are pleased that the District cancelled Diversity Day instead of censoring the viewpoints of Christians and former homosexuals. One of the Diversity Day organizers labeled the former homosexual's viewpoint as 'non-positive.' This is yet another attempt to indoctrinate our youth with the harmful message that homosexuals cannot change. While touting the message of tolerance, homosexual activists refuse to be tolerant of opposing viewpoints. Our youth deserve to know the truth about homosexuality - that people can choose to overcome same-sex attractions and that acting on those attractions results in devastating physical, mental, and spiritual consequences."

Sponsor of the Month

We appreciate the individuals and companies that underwrite these Liberty Alert email updates to keep you informed about religious freedom, the sanctity of human life and the traditional family. For more information about this unique opportunity, call us at 800-671-1776, and ask how you can become a Liberty Alert Sponsor of the Month.

We Are Grateful for our Friends ...

"invest for your goals, invest with your values"

A nationwide investment firm committed to providing products and services not only superior in strength and performance, but also embracing Christian values. You may have God's money invested in companies involved with abortion, pornography, or homosexual lifestyles without even knowing it! For a free Christian values report of your present investment portfolio, visit www.christianfp.com or call (877) 723-6975.

Make a tax-deductible online donation to this ministry

Request a complimentary subscription to this informative "Liberty Alert" email

Liberty Counsel, headquartered in Orlando, Florida, is a nonprofit litigation, education and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of human life and the traditional family. On the campus of Liberty University School of Law in Lynchburg, Virginia, Liberty Counsel's Center for Constitutional Litigation and Policy trains attorneys, law students, policymakers, legislators, clergy and world leaders in constitutional principles and government policies.

Mathew D. Staver, Esq.

Liberty Counsel
PO Box 540774
Orlando, FL 32854
800-671-1776

Please forward this email to your entire address book. We respect your privacy and will not share your contact information with others.

Restoring the culture one case at a time by advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of human life

and the traditional family